|
Maximize Your RNA Yield What Yield to Expect
RNA content can vary widely between tissues, cell-types,
physiological state, etc. If you are accustomed to working with tissues
where RNA is plentiful, such as liver, you may have unrealistically
high expectations of RNA yields from tissues with lower RNA contents
(e.g. skin, muscle, bone). Tables 1 and 2 provide general guidelines
for estimating RNA yields from a variety of cells and tissues. Remember
that RNA yields from analogous tissues in different organisms can
also vary.
|
|
|
Table 1. Total
RNA Yields from 1 mg of Various Tissues.
|
|
|
|
Table 2. General
Guideline for the Amount of Total and Poly(A) RNA to Expect
from Tissues and Cells.
|
Cellular Disruption Get the RNA Out
Thorough cellular disruption is critical for high
RNA quality and yield. RNA that is trapped in intact cells is often
removed with cellular debris and is unavailable for subsequent isolation.
Therefore, it is crucial to choose the disruption method best suited
to your tissue or organism to maximize yield. Table 3 summarizes
our recommendations for cellular disruption for different specimens.
Mechanical cell disruption techniques include grinding, homogenization
with dounce or rotor-stator homogenizers (polytron), vortexing, sonication,
and use of bead and freezer mills. Complete disruption of some tissues
may require using a combination of these techniques. Rotor-stator
homogenizers, alone or in conjunction with other disruption techniques,
generally result in higher RNA yields than other types of homogenizers.
|
|
|
Table 3. Recommendation
for Cellular Disruption of Different Sample Types.
|
Enzymatic digestion is often recommended for yeast
and bacteria to dissolve cell wall structures that are not easily
sheared by mechanical forces alone. For a detailed
discussion of cellular disruption, please refer to Technical Bulletin #183.
Fine Tuning RNA Extraction to Maximize Yield
Protein-, lipid-, or nucleic acid-rich tissues
can present special challenges to both phenol-based and glass-binding,
column-based RNA isolation procedures. These tissues may require
more manipulation and fine-tuning of RNA isolation procedures to
maximize yield and quality.
In phenol-based isolations, such as ToTALLY
RNA™ and TRI Reagent® (Ambion's
single-step extraction reagent), lysis in a chaotropic reagent
is followed by organic extraction. The most frequent problems with
phenol-based procedures are incomplete phase separation and/or
excessive loss of material at the interface. Dilution of lysates
prior to extraction will reduce both the viscosity and the concentration
of proteins, lipids, and nucleic acids, although protein- or DNA-rich
tissues may require additional phenol:chloroform:IAA extractions
to remove these contaminants. Extraction of lipid-rich tissues
often results in the formation of a flocculent white precipitate
in the aqueous phase. This is likely due to precipitation of insoluble
lipids and can be remedied by adding additional chloroform and
re-extracting (or chloroform extracting the cell lysate prior to
phenol extraction or glass binding). Another manipulation that
may maximize RNA recovery from difficult samples is a rapid interface
re-spin or back-extraction. To back-extract, the last portion of
the aqueous phase and contaminating interface material are transferred
to a 1.5 ml tube, the aqueous phase is diluted with more lysis
buffer or water, and this mixture is then centrifuged to separate
the phases. The clarified aqueous portion can be recovered and
pooled with the rest of the aqueous phase to improve RNA recovery.
To assure high purity, phenol:chloroform:IAA extractions should
be performed until contaminants at the interface are absent.
Column-based procedures, such as RNAqueous™,
utilize glass-fiber filters that bind RNA in the presence of chaotropic
salts. Proteins and DNA are removed by washing the filter and RNA
is then eluted in RNase-free water. The most frequent cause of low
RNA yield is overloading the column, which can cause the column to
clog or can prevent the RNA from binding efficiently. Methods that
reduce viscosity, such as dilution with lysis buffer, extensive mechanical
disruption, and centrifugation, will increase RNA yield. If yields
are still lower than expected, consider diluting the clarified lysate
and splitting it between two columns, which will further reduce the
concentration of contaminants and improve RNA binding and recovery.
Ambion also offers the Plant
RNA Isolation Aid, which can be added to the RNAqueous Lysis/Binding
solution prior to homogenization to bind and remove polysaccharides
and polyphenols commonly present in plant tissues. For more detailed
information about isolating RNA from difficult tissues, see Technical
Bulletin #177.
Related Articles
|