| Designing a Better siRNA
The siRNA design algorithm designed by Cenix
BioScience, with whom Ambion has partnered to develop a genome
wide siRNA library,
represents a major improvement over the design rules first described
by Tuschl and colleagues. On average, ~50% of the siRNAs featuring
the Tuschl design rules (target sites beginning with AA, 3' UU
overhangs for both the sense and antisense siRNA strands, ~50%
G/C content; 1-3) provide at least 50% reduction in target gene
expression (4). In contrast, in an initial screen of 79 human
genes, 94% of siRNAs designed by Cenix provided greater than
70% reduction in target mRNA levels (Figure 1).
|
|
|
Figure 1.The
Effectiveness of Cenix Designed siRNAs. siRNAs
targeting 79 human genes were designed using the algorithm
developed by Cenix. The top siRNA candidate for each target
was prepared and transfected at a 100 nM final concentration.
Forty eight hours post-transfection, target gene expression
was quantified by real-time RT-PCR. Relative reduction
in mRNA expression was measured against cells transfected
with a negative control siRNA. Sample size was normalized
by measuring 18S rRNA in the various samples using a real-time
PCR. |
To develop a rational siRNA design algorithm,
Cenix and Ambion tested multiple siRNAs targeting hundreds of
different human genes
that were expressed at detectable levels in several different cell
lines. More than 900 siRNAs have been designed and tested to date.
The effective and ineffective siRNAs were used to judge the impact
of a number of physical characteristics on siRNA potency and specificity,
including Tm, nucleotide content of the 3' overhangs, siRNA
length, nucleotide distribution over the length of the siRNA, and
presence and location of mismatches. Those characteristics that
correlated with siRNA effectiveness and specificity were incorporated
into the design algorithm. A key step in the algorithm is a stringent
analysis of each siRNA sequence to maximize target specificity.
The result is a robust algorithm that uniquely addresses gene-to-gene
variability in susceptibility to RNAi. Both Ambion and Cenix are
committed to continual refinement of the algorithm as more is learned
about the criteria that affect siRNA potency and specificity.
The siRNA design algorithm designed by Cenix is able to identify
effective siRNA sequences at a very high rate (Figure 1). The algorithm
is also able to identify highly potent siRNA sequences that are
effective at low concentrations. Figure 2 shows the potency of
six different siRNAs designed using the algorithm. All were as
effective at reducing target mRNA levels at 10 nM and 30 nM, as
at 100 nM. The use of a highly potent sequence means that less
siRNA can be used per experiment, saving reagent costs and permitting
the use of multiple siRNAs targeting different genes in a single
experiment. More importantly, minimizing the working concentration
of siRNA in an experiment has recently been recognized to maximize
the specificity of the RNAi effect (5-7).
For your convenience, Ambion can custom
synthesize siRNAs pre-designed using the algorithm developed
by Cenix. Designs are immediately
available for all human, mouse, and rat genes in the RefSeq
database maintained by NCBI. Alternatively, Ambion and Cenix
have partnered
to
validate individual siRNAs that have been designed by the algorithm.
These Silencer™ Validated
siRNAs, available targeting various human
genes and in 5 nmol unit sizes, have been verified to reduce
target gene expression by >70% using a real-time RT-PCR
assay.
|
|
|
Figure 2. Effectiveness
of Validated siRNAs at Various Concentrations. The
indicated siRNAs were complexed with siPORT™ Lipid
and the resulting complexes were added to HeLa cells in
twenty-four well plates at the final concentration of siRNA
shown. Forty-eight hours after transfection, RNA from the
treated cells was recovered using RNAqueous® Mag-96
RNA Isolation Kit and reverse transcribed using the RETROscript® Kit.
Target cDNA levels were measured by real-time PCR. Expression
of target genes in the transfected cells was compared to
cells transfected with an equal concentration of Silencer™ Negative
Control #1. Input cDNA in the different samples was normalized
using real-time data for 18S rRNA. The bar graphs represent
an average of three data points. |
back
to top
|
|
| TechNotes
Archive |
| Ordering
Information |
|
|
References
1. Elbashir SM, Harborth J, Lendeckel W, Yalcin A, Weber K, Tuschl T
(2001). Duplexes of 21-nucleotide RNAs mediate RNA interference in mammalian
cell culture. Nature 411: 494-498.
2. J. Harborth, S. M. Elbashir, K. Vandenburgh, H. Manninga, S. A. Scaringe,
K. Weber and T. Tuschl (2003). Sequence, chemical, and structural variation of
small interfering RNAs and short hairpin RNAs and the effect on mammalian gene
silencing, Antisense Nucleic Acid Drug Dev. 13: 83-106.
3. Tuschl lab (May 8, 2003)
The
siRNA user guide.
4. Brown D, Jarvis R, Pallotta V, Byrom M, and Ford L (2002) RNA Interference
in Mammalian Cell Culture: Design, Execution and Analysis of the siRNA Effect.
Ambion TechNotes 9(1).
5. Semizarov D, Frost L, Sarthy A, Kroeger P, Halbert DN, Fesik SW. (2003) Specificity
of short interfering RNA determined through gene expression signatures. Proc
Natl Acad Sci USA 100: 6347-6352.
6. Jackson AL, Bartz SR, Schelter J, Kobayashi SV, Burchard J, Mao M, Li B, Cavet
G, Linsley PS. (2003) Expression profiling reveals off-target gene regulation
by RNAi. Nat Biotechnol. 21: 635-637.
7. Editors of Nature Cell Biology (2003) Whither RNAi? Nat Cell Biol. 5:489-490. |
|